The court held in [ case ]that contributory negligence can operate as a defence in the third category (Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract), but not in the first (Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty) or second (Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract). The Law Commission has recommended (in 1993) that contributory negligence be available as a defence in category two as well as three (but not in category one).
Answer
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The court held in [ case ]that contributory negligence can operate as a defence in the third category (Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract), but not in the first (Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty) or second (Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract). The Law Commission has recommended (in 1993) that contributory negligence be available as a defence in category two as well as three (but not in category one).
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The court held in [ case ]that contributory negligence can operate as a defence in the third category (Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract), but not in the first (Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty) or second (Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract). The Law Commission has recommended (in 1993) that contributory negligence be available as a defence in category two as well as three (but not in category one).
Answer
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The court held in Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher that contributory negligence can operate as a defence in the third category (Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which aris
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.