In [ case ], Hobhouse J identified the following categories of obligation:
1. Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty.
2. Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract.
3. Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract.
Answer
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher [1986] 2 All ER 488
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In [ case ], Hobhouse J identified the following categories of obligation:
1. Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty.
2. Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract.
3. Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In [ case ], Hobhouse J identified the following categories of obligation:
1. Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty.
2. Where the defendant's liability arises from a contractual obligation which is expressed in terms of taking care (or its equivalent), but does not correspond to a common law duty to take care which would exist in the given case independent of contract.
3. Where the defendant's liability in contract is the same as his liability in the tort of negligence which arises independently of the contract.
Answer
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher [1986] 2 All ER 488
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher [1986] 2 All ER 488, Hobhouse J identified the following categories of obligation:
1. Where the defendant's liability arises from a breach of a strict contractual duty.
2. Where the defendant's l
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.