The rule as stated in Hadley v Baxendale has two parts (as indicated by the numbers in the square brackets in the above quotation). The first limb – loss of a type ordinarily and naturally arising from the breach – is based on [...]. If the loss is deemed a normal type of loss which would follow from the breach then it will be recoverable under the first limb of the Hadley v Baxendale test.
Answer
imputed knowledge rather than the actual knowledge of the parties. Everyone is taken to know what happens in 'the usual course of things' and, consequently, what loss is liable to result from a breach of contract in that 'usual course'
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The rule as stated in Hadley v Baxendale has two parts (as indicated by the numbers in the square brackets in the above quotation). The first limb – loss of a type ordinarily and naturally arising from the breach – is based on [...]. If the loss is deemed a normal type of loss which would follow from the breach then it will be recoverable under the first limb of the Hadley v Baxendale test.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The rule as stated in Hadley v Baxendale has two parts (as indicated by the numbers in the square brackets in the above quotation). The first limb – loss of a type ordinarily and naturally arising from the breach – is based on [...]. If the loss is deemed a normal type of loss which would follow from the breach then it will be recoverable under the first limb of the Hadley v Baxendale test.
Answer
imputed knowledge rather than the actual knowledge of the parties. Everyone is taken to know what happens in 'the usual course of things' and, consequently, what loss is liable to result from a breach of contract in that 'usual course'
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it y>The rule as stated in Hadley v Baxendale has two parts (as indicated by the numbers in the square brackets in the above quotation). The first limb – loss of a type ordinarily and naturally arising from the breach – is based on imputed knowledge rather than the actual knowledge of the parties. Everyone is taken to know what happens in 'the usual course of things' and, consequently, what loss is liable to result from a breach of contract in that 'usual course'. If the loss is deemed a normal type of loss which would follow from the breach then it will be recoverable under the first limb of the Hadley v Baxendale test. <body><
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.