However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49).
Answer
Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49).
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49).
Answer
Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it eral rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (<span>Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.