Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]).
Answer
Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]).
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
However, exceptions have developed to this general rule so that in a limited number of situations mental distress will be compensated. Initially, such compensation was limited to cases involving contracts whose whole purpose was the provision of pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind ([ case ]).
Answer
Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ind (Jarvis v Swan Tours [1973] QB 233). More recently, the House of Lords has allowed damages for non-pecuniary loss where a major object (though not the whole purpose) of the contract was to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind (<span>Farley v Skinner (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 49).<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.