In C & P Haulage v Middleton, the plaintiff was seeking its reliance loss (in a situation where it had no expectation loss), however, it did not succeed as [...]. The plaintiff was therefore limited to recovering a nominal amount of damages in recognition of the technical breach it had sustained. This case shows that it will only be possible for the claimant to claim his reliance interest if the contract would have enabled him to recoup those expenses had it been properly performed.
Answer
it failed to show that, had the contract gone ahead properly, it would have been able to recoup this expenditure in any event
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In C & P Haulage v Middleton, the plaintiff was seeking its reliance loss (in a situation where it had no expectation loss), however, it did not succeed as [...]. The plaintiff was therefore limited to recovering a nominal amount of damages in recognition of the technical breach it had sustained. This case shows that it will only be possible for the claimant to claim his reliance interest if the contract would have enabled him to recoup those expenses had it been properly performed.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In C & P Haulage v Middleton, the plaintiff was seeking its reliance loss (in a situation where it had no expectation loss), however, it did not succeed as [...]. The plaintiff was therefore limited to recovering a nominal amount of damages in recognition of the technical breach it had sustained. This case shows that it will only be possible for the claimant to claim his reliance interest if the contract would have enabled him to recoup those expenses had it been properly performed.
Answer
it failed to show that, had the contract gone ahead properly, it would have been able to recoup this expenditure in any event
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In C & P Haulage v Middleton, the plaintiff was seeking its reliance loss (in a situation where it had no expectation loss), however, it did not succeed as it failed to show that, had the contract gone ahead properly, it would have been able to recoup this expenditure in any event. The plaintiff was therefore limited to recovering a nominal amount of damages in recognition of the technical breach it had sustained. This case shows that it will only be possible f
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.