Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
in Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539—it has been emphasised that the guidelines should be read as presumptions, that each case needs to be assessed in its own context and, in particular, that caution needs to be exercised before jumping to the conclusion that a clause is a penalty simply because it is not in the nature of a genuine pre-estimate of loss. If there is a ‘new approach’ in the jurisprudence, it is that [...]; and that, where the contractors are commercial people with professional advice, the courts should be slow to disallow an agreed sum as penal (although, on the facts in Makdessi, the Court of Appeal ruled that the clauses at issue were penal).
Answer
even clauses that seem to agree sums that are unreasonable and disproportionate might still be commercially justified

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
in Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539—it has been emphasised that the guidelines should be read as presumptions, that each case needs to be assessed in its own context and, in particular, that caution needs to be exercised before jumping to the conclusion that a clause is a penalty simply because it is not in the nature of a genuine pre-estimate of loss. If there is a ‘new approach’ in the jurisprudence, it is that [...]; and that, where the contractors are commercial people with professional advice, the courts should be slow to disallow an agreed sum as penal (although, on the facts in Makdessi, the Court of Appeal ruled that the clauses at issue were penal).
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
in Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539—it has been emphasised that the guidelines should be read as presumptions, that each case needs to be assessed in its own context and, in particular, that caution needs to be exercised before jumping to the conclusion that a clause is a penalty simply because it is not in the nature of a genuine pre-estimate of loss. If there is a ‘new approach’ in the jurisprudence, it is that [...]; and that, where the contractors are commercial people with professional advice, the courts should be slow to disallow an agreed sum as penal (although, on the facts in Makdessi, the Court of Appeal ruled that the clauses at issue were penal).
Answer
even clauses that seem to agree sums that are unreasonable and disproportionate might still be commercially justified
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
rticular, that caution needs to be exercised before jumping to the conclusion that a clause is a penalty simply because it is not in the nature of a genuine pre-estimate of loss. If there is a ‘new approach’ in the jurisprudence, it is that <span>even clauses that seem to agree sums that are unreasonable and disproportionate might still be commercially justified; and that, where the contractors are commercial people with professional advice, the courts should be slow to disallow an agreed sum as penal (although, on the facts in Makdessi, the

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.