The concept of sufficient degree of control to determine who is an occupier has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in [case]. Here, the claimant, an eight-year-old child, despite instructions to the contrary, climbed up onto a flat roof above a supermarket and adjacent to the defendant’s flat. He fell from the roof and was injured. His action against both the owner of the flat and the supermarket was dismissed because neither party could be found to have a sufficient degree of control over the roof area.
Answer
Bailey v Armes (1999) EGCS 21
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
The concept of sufficient degree of control to determine who is an occupier has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in [case]. Here, the claimant, an eight-year-old child, despite instructions to the contrary, climbed up onto a flat roof above a supermarket and adjacent to the defendant’s flat. He fell from the roof and was injured. His action against both the owner of the flat and the supermarket was dismissed because neither party could be found to have a sufficient degree of control over the roof area.
Answer
?
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
The concept of sufficient degree of control to determine who is an occupier has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in [case]. Here, the claimant, an eight-year-old child, despite instructions to the contrary, climbed up onto a flat roof above a supermarket and adjacent to the defendant’s flat. He fell from the roof and was injured. His action against both the owner of the flat and the supermarket was dismissed because neither party could be found to have a sufficient degree of control over the roof area.
Answer
Bailey v Armes (1999) EGCS 21
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The concept of sufficient degree of control to determine who is an occupier has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in Bailey v Armes (1999) EGCS 21. Here, the claimant, an eight-year-old child, despite instructions to the contrary, climbed up onto a flat roof above a supermarket and adjacent to the defendant’s flat. He fell from th
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.