In [case]it was held that the plaintiff, who was injured whilst walking along a seaside promenade, had a claim against the water board and the local authority. Both were held to be occupiers though in this case, because the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the state of the promenade, it was the water authority who were liable.
Answer
Collier v Anglian Water Authority, The Times, 26 March 1983
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In [case]it was held that the plaintiff, who was injured whilst walking along a seaside promenade, had a claim against the water board and the local authority. Both were held to be occupiers though in this case, because the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the state of the promenade, it was the water authority who were liable.
Answer
?
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In [case]it was held that the plaintiff, who was injured whilst walking along a seaside promenade, had a claim against the water board and the local authority. Both were held to be occupiers though in this case, because the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the state of the promenade, it was the water authority who were liable.
Answer
Collier v Anglian Water Authority, The Times, 26 March 1983
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Collier v Anglian Water Authority, The Times, 26 March 1983 it was held that the plaintiff, who was injured whilst walking along a seaside promenade, had a claim against the water board and the local authority. Both were held to be occupiers th
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.