It must be shown that the breach caused the damage and the damage is reasonably foreseeable. However, there is nothing in either Act setting out how causation or remoteness should be tackled. Looking to the common law, the authorities have tended to focus their energy mainly on breach (and damage and defences.) In other words, once loss has been suffered by the claimant and once the defendant has breached their duty to that claimant, then [...]. Courts have only tended to discuss causation or remoteness where there are glaring problems with either.
Answer
there is an assumption that causation and remoteness have been satisfied
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
It must be shown that the breach caused the damage and the damage is reasonably foreseeable. However, there is nothing in either Act setting out how causation or remoteness should be tackled. Looking to the common law, the authorities have tended to focus their energy mainly on breach (and damage and defences.) In other words, once loss has been suffered by the claimant and once the defendant has breached their duty to that claimant, then [...]. Courts have only tended to discuss causation or remoteness where there are glaring problems with either.
Answer
?
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
It must be shown that the breach caused the damage and the damage is reasonably foreseeable. However, there is nothing in either Act setting out how causation or remoteness should be tackled. Looking to the common law, the authorities have tended to focus their energy mainly on breach (and damage and defences.) In other words, once loss has been suffered by the claimant and once the defendant has breached their duty to that claimant, then [...]. Courts have only tended to discuss causation or remoteness where there are glaring problems with either.
Answer
there is an assumption that causation and remoteness have been satisfied
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the common law, the authorities have tended to focus their energy mainly on breach (and damage and defences.) In other words, once loss has been suffered by the claimant and once the defendant has breached their duty to that claimant, then <span>there is an assumption that causation and remoteness have been satisfied. Courts have only tended to discuss causation or remoteness where there are glaring problems with either.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.