Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
As an example, White v Blackmore [1972] 2 QB 651 concerned a car rally meeting. Notices on the site stated that there was danger and that the occupier would not be liable for any damage howsoever caused. There were similar notices in the programme for the race meeting. The plaintiff had seen the notices. During the event he was standing in a spectator area behind a rope barrier. A wheel of one of the vehicles caught the rope, released it and catapulted the defendant 20 yards thereby killing him. It was held that volens did not apply as, [...]
Answer
in the circumstances, the plaintiff could not have been fully aware of the particular risk caused by the inadequate barrier. However, it was held that the notices constituted a reasonable exclusion of liability

Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
As an example, White v Blackmore [1972] 2 QB 651 concerned a car rally meeting. Notices on the site stated that there was danger and that the occupier would not be liable for any damage howsoever caused. There were similar notices in the programme for the race meeting. The plaintiff had seen the notices. During the event he was standing in a spectator area behind a rope barrier. A wheel of one of the vehicles caught the rope, released it and catapulted the defendant 20 yards thereby killing him. It was held that volens did not apply as, [...]
Answer
?

Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
As an example, White v Blackmore [1972] 2 QB 651 concerned a car rally meeting. Notices on the site stated that there was danger and that the occupier would not be liable for any damage howsoever caused. There were similar notices in the programme for the race meeting. The plaintiff had seen the notices. During the event he was standing in a spectator area behind a rope barrier. A wheel of one of the vehicles caught the rope, released it and catapulted the defendant 20 yards thereby killing him. It was held that volens did not apply as, [...]
Answer
in the circumstances, the plaintiff could not have been fully aware of the particular risk caused by the inadequate barrier. However, it was held that the notices constituted a reasonable exclusion of liability
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
es. During the event he was standing in a spectator area behind a rope barrier. A wheel of one of the vehicles caught the rope, released it and catapulted the defendant 20 yards thereby killing him. It was held that volens did not apply as, <span>in the circumstances, the plaintiff could not have been fully aware of the particular risk caused by the inadequate barrier. However, it was held that the notices constituted a reasonable exclusion of liability<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.