In [ case ]the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’.
Answer
Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In [ case ]the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’.
Answer
?
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In [ case ]the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’.
Answer
Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122 the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where the defendant had placed notices stating
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.