In Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122 the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where [...].
Answer
the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122 the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#occupiers-liability #tort
Question
In Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122 the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where [...].
Answer
the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2003] 3 All ER 1122 the House of Lords ruled that there was no liability under OLA 1984 for the claimant’s injuries sustained when diving in a shallow lake, where the defendant had placed notices stating ‘Dangerous Water. No Swimming’.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.