Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#human-rights #public
Question
In the conjoined appeals of Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, however, the Supreme Court unanimously decided that the so-called 'Snatch Land Rover claims', similarly relating to the deaths of British servicemen operating in the field of combat in Iraq (in 2005 and 2006), did attract the protection of the Convention. Lord Hope believed that Strasbourg had partly redefined the concept of jurisdiction from the position taken in the Bankovic case to a recognition in Al-Skeini v UK that the key element was the degree of control and authority exercised by the relevant state over the individual. When considering the way in which the armed forces operate, he held that serviceman relinquish almost total control over their lives to the state. Accordingly, [...].
Answer
deaths of servicemen in the battlefield fall within the jurisdiction of the ECHR, art 1, regardless of whether they are operating in areas not under the control of the contracting state

Tags
#human-rights #public
Question
In the conjoined appeals of Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, however, the Supreme Court unanimously decided that the so-called 'Snatch Land Rover claims', similarly relating to the deaths of British servicemen operating in the field of combat in Iraq (in 2005 and 2006), did attract the protection of the Convention. Lord Hope believed that Strasbourg had partly redefined the concept of jurisdiction from the position taken in the Bankovic case to a recognition in Al-Skeini v UK that the key element was the degree of control and authority exercised by the relevant state over the individual. When considering the way in which the armed forces operate, he held that serviceman relinquish almost total control over their lives to the state. Accordingly, [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#human-rights #public
Question
In the conjoined appeals of Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, however, the Supreme Court unanimously decided that the so-called 'Snatch Land Rover claims', similarly relating to the deaths of British servicemen operating in the field of combat in Iraq (in 2005 and 2006), did attract the protection of the Convention. Lord Hope believed that Strasbourg had partly redefined the concept of jurisdiction from the position taken in the Bankovic case to a recognition in Al-Skeini v UK that the key element was the degree of control and authority exercised by the relevant state over the individual. When considering the way in which the armed forces operate, he held that serviceman relinquish almost total control over their lives to the state. Accordingly, [...].
Answer
deaths of servicemen in the battlefield fall within the jurisdiction of the ECHR, art 1, regardless of whether they are operating in areas not under the control of the contracting state
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
gree of control and authority exercised by the relevant state over the individual. When considering the way in which the armed forces operate, he held that serviceman relinquish almost total control over their lives to the state. Accordingly, <span>deaths of servicemen in the battlefield fall within the jurisdiction of the ECHR, art 1, regardless of whether they are operating in areas not under the control of the contracting state.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.