The court also acknowledged, in view of the operational choices that must be made in terms of priorities and resources, that the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an excessive burden on states and public authorities.'[I]t must be established … that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual or individuals from the criminal acts of a third party and that [...].'
The court also acknowledged, in view of the operational choices that must be made in terms of priorities and resources, that the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an excessive burden on states and public authorities.'[I]t must be established … that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual or individuals from the criminal acts of a third party and that [...].'
The court also acknowledged, in view of the operational choices that must be made in terms of priorities and resources, that the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an excessive burden on states and public authorities.'[I]t must be established … that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual or individuals from the criminal acts of a third party and that [...].'
status | not learned | measured difficulty | 37% [default] | last interval [days] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
repetition number in this series | 0 | memorised on | scheduled repetition | ||||
scheduled repetition interval | last repetition or drill |