In A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, the House of Lords quashed the derogation order (and entered a section 4 declaration of incompatibility in respect of the Anti- Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, ss 21–23), on the ground that [...].
Answer
the derogation measures were not 'strictly required by the exigencies of the situation'
Tags
#human-rights #public
Question
In A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, the House of Lords quashed the derogation order (and entered a section 4 declaration of incompatibility in respect of the Anti- Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, ss 21–23), on the ground that [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#human-rights #public
Question
In A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, the House of Lords quashed the derogation order (and entered a section 4 declaration of incompatibility in respect of the Anti- Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, ss 21–23), on the ground that [...].
Answer
the derogation measures were not 'strictly required by the exigencies of the situation'
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it tate for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, the House of Lords quashed the derogation order (and entered a section 4 declaration of incompatibility in respect of the Anti- Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, ss 21–23), on the ground that <span>the derogation measures were not 'strictly required by the exigencies of the situation'.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.