The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should [...]unless there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution.
Answer
follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence
Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should [...]unless there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution.
Answer
?
Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should [...]unless there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution.
Answer
follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should <span>follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence unless there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution. </
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.