Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence unless [...].
Answer
there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution

Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence unless [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
The first decision to consider the meaning and extent of HRA 1998, s 2(1) was R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence unless [...].
Answer
there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, [2001] UKHL 23, where the House of Lords held that, while the case law of the ECtHR is not binding, domestic courts should follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence unless <span>there were special circumstances, or the decisions of the ECtHR compelled a conclusion fundamentally at odds with the distribution of powers under the UK constitution. <span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.