A condition precedent is a condition that must be satisfied before any rights come into existence. Where the coming into existence of a contract is subject to the occurrence of a specific event, the contract is said to be subject to a condition precedent. The contract is suspended until the condition is satisfied. Where a condition precedent is not fulfilled, there is no true discharge because the rights and obligations under the contract were contingent upon an event which did not occur, i.e. the rights and obligations never came into existence: [ case ].
Answer
Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 El & Bl 379
Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
A condition precedent is a condition that must be satisfied before any rights come into existence. Where the coming into existence of a contract is subject to the occurrence of a specific event, the contract is said to be subject to a condition precedent. The contract is suspended until the condition is satisfied. Where a condition precedent is not fulfilled, there is no true discharge because the rights and obligations under the contract were contingent upon an event which did not occur, i.e. the rights and obligations never came into existence: [ case ].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
A condition precedent is a condition that must be satisfied before any rights come into existence. Where the coming into existence of a contract is subject to the occurrence of a specific event, the contract is said to be subject to a condition precedent. The contract is suspended until the condition is satisfied. Where a condition precedent is not fulfilled, there is no true discharge because the rights and obligations under the contract were contingent upon an event which did not occur, i.e. the rights and obligations never came into existence: [ case ].
Answer
Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 El & Bl 379
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ed. Where a condition precedent is not fulfilled, there is no true discharge because the rights and obligations under the contract were contingent upon an event which did not occur, i.e. the rights and obligations never came into existence: <span>Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 El & Bl 379.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.