The case of Hoenig v Isaacs might be compared with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 1 WLR 1009 where, by a contract with the defendant, the claimant undertook to install a central heating system in the defendant's house at a cost of £560. The system did not work and the defendant refused to pay any money. The cost of remedying the defects would have been £174. The Court of Appeal held that the claimant was not entitled to recover any of the contract price but, [...].
Answer
had he offered to remedy the defects, and had then done so, he would be justified in claiming the contract price
Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
The case of Hoenig v Isaacs might be compared with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 1 WLR 1009 where, by a contract with the defendant, the claimant undertook to install a central heating system in the defendant's house at a cost of £560. The system did not work and the defendant refused to pay any money. The cost of remedying the defects would have been £174. The Court of Appeal held that the claimant was not entitled to recover any of the contract price but, [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
The case of Hoenig v Isaacs might be compared with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 1 WLR 1009 where, by a contract with the defendant, the claimant undertook to install a central heating system in the defendant's house at a cost of £560. The system did not work and the defendant refused to pay any money. The cost of remedying the defects would have been £174. The Court of Appeal held that the claimant was not entitled to recover any of the contract price but, [...].
Answer
had he offered to remedy the defects, and had then done so, he would be justified in claiming the contract price
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it cost of £560. The system did not work and the defendant refused to pay any money. The cost of remedying the defects would have been £174. The Court of Appeal held that the claimant was not entitled to recover any of the contract price but, <span>had he offered to remedy the defects, and had then done so, he would be justified in claiming the contract price. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.