Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
Where a contract involves the performance of a service, it is possible that the service will be provided by a third party to the contract.

In Robson and Sharpe v Drummond (1831) 2 B & Ad 303 a person had agreed to keep a carriage in repair for five years and to paint it from time to time. It was held by the court that he was not entitled to delegate performance of the contract to his partner. This was seen as a contract of personal service and it might neatly be contrasted with British Waggon Co v Lea & Co (1880) 5 QBD 149, where a contract to let out railway wagons and to keep them in repair for seven years could be vicariously performed since [...]. Here the judge emphasised that the work was of an ordinary nature which could be accomplished by the average workman.
Answer
it did not matter to the hirer who kept the wagons in repair so long as the work was properly done

Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
Where a contract involves the performance of a service, it is possible that the service will be provided by a third party to the contract.

In Robson and Sharpe v Drummond (1831) 2 B & Ad 303 a person had agreed to keep a carriage in repair for five years and to paint it from time to time. It was held by the court that he was not entitled to delegate performance of the contract to his partner. This was seen as a contract of personal service and it might neatly be contrasted with British Waggon Co v Lea & Co (1880) 5 QBD 149, where a contract to let out railway wagons and to keep them in repair for seven years could be vicariously performed since [...]. Here the judge emphasised that the work was of an ordinary nature which could be accomplished by the average workman.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #discharge #law
Question
Where a contract involves the performance of a service, it is possible that the service will be provided by a third party to the contract.

In Robson and Sharpe v Drummond (1831) 2 B & Ad 303 a person had agreed to keep a carriage in repair for five years and to paint it from time to time. It was held by the court that he was not entitled to delegate performance of the contract to his partner. This was seen as a contract of personal service and it might neatly be contrasted with British Waggon Co v Lea & Co (1880) 5 QBD 149, where a contract to let out railway wagons and to keep them in repair for seven years could be vicariously performed since [...]. Here the judge emphasised that the work was of an ordinary nature which could be accomplished by the average workman.
Answer
it did not matter to the hirer who kept the wagons in repair so long as the work was properly done
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
contract of personal service and it might neatly be contrasted with British Waggon Co v Lea & Co (1880) 5 QBD 149, where a contract to let out railway wagons and to keep them in repair for seven years could be vicariously performed since <span>it did not matter to the hirer who kept the wagons in repair so long as the work was properly done. Here the judge emphasised that the work was of an ordinary nature which could be accomplished by the average workman.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.