Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500 FACTS: The buyer of a car discovered that it had been stolen before it had come into the possession of the seller (a car dealer). As a result, the vehicle was returned to the original owner. The buyer sued the car dealer, seeking to recover the full price he had paid for the car, irrespective of the fact that he had used the car for four months. HELD by the Court of Appeal: There was a breach of the implied condition arising under [ statute ]. The car dealer had no title and the buyer, who had paid to become the full owner of the car, had, therefore, received nothing from him. There was a complete failure of consideration and the full purchase price was recoverable.
Answer
s 12 of the SGA 1979
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500 FACTS: The buyer of a car discovered that it had been stolen before it had come into the possession of the seller (a car dealer). As a result, the vehicle was returned to the original owner. The buyer sued the car dealer, seeking to recover the full price he had paid for the car, irrespective of the fact that he had used the car for four months. HELD by the Court of Appeal: There was a breach of the implied condition arising under [ statute ]. The car dealer had no title and the buyer, who had paid to become the full owner of the car, had, therefore, received nothing from him. There was a complete failure of consideration and the full purchase price was recoverable.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500 FACTS: The buyer of a car discovered that it had been stolen before it had come into the possession of the seller (a car dealer). As a result, the vehicle was returned to the original owner. The buyer sued the car dealer, seeking to recover the full price he had paid for the car, irrespective of the fact that he had used the car for four months. HELD by the Court of Appeal: There was a breach of the implied condition arising under [ statute ]. The car dealer had no title and the buyer, who had paid to become the full owner of the car, had, therefore, received nothing from him. There was a complete failure of consideration and the full purchase price was recoverable.
Answer
s 12 of the SGA 1979
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it buyer sued the car dealer, seeking to recover the full price he had paid for the car, irrespective of the fact that he had used the car for four months. HELD by the Court of Appeal: There was a breach of the implied condition arising under <span>s 12 of the SGA 1979. The car dealer had no title and the buyer, who had paid to become the full owner of the car, had, therefore, received nothing from him. There was a complete failure of consideration
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.