See also [ case ]where the retailers (along with the manufacturers) were held liable for the dermatitis caused to the wearer of woollen underpants. Clearly, they were not fit for their purpose
Answer
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd [1936] AC 85
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
See also [ case ]where the retailers (along with the manufacturers) were held liable for the dermatitis caused to the wearer of woollen underpants. Clearly, they were not fit for their purpose
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
See also [ case ]where the retailers (along with the manufacturers) were held liable for the dermatitis caused to the wearer of woollen underpants. Clearly, they were not fit for their purpose
Answer
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd [1936] AC 85
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it See also Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd [1936] AC 85 where the retailers (along with the manufacturers) were held liable for the dermatitis caused to the wearer of woollen underpants. Clearly, they were not fit for their purpose</
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.