Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
It is also apparent from the decision in [ case ] that the court was influenced by the fact that the contract had been reduced into writing and yet the previous oral statement was not included. The inference drawn by the court was that the statement could not have been regarded as significant by the parties. If it had been, they would have ensured its inclusion in the written agreement. Consequently, the court concluded that the statement regarding the year of the model was never intended to be a term of the contract but a representation.
Answer
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
It is also apparent from the decision in [ case ] that the court was influenced by the fact that the contract had been reduced into writing and yet the previous oral statement was not included. The inference drawn by the court was that the statement could not have been regarded as significant by the parties. If it had been, they would have ensured its inclusion in the written agreement. Consequently, the court concluded that the statement regarding the year of the model was never intended to be a term of the contract but a representation.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
It is also apparent from the decision in [ case ] that the court was influenced by the fact that the contract had been reduced into writing and yet the previous oral statement was not included. The inference drawn by the court was that the statement could not have been regarded as significant by the parties. If it had been, they would have ensured its inclusion in the written agreement. Consequently, the court concluded that the statement regarding the year of the model was never intended to be a term of the contract but a representation.
Answer
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
It is also apparent from the decision in Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615 that the court was influenced by the fact that the contract had been reduced into writing and yet the previous oral statement was not included. The inference drawn by the court was tha

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.