Where the party who made the statement had exclusive access to information or special knowledge as compared with the other party, this is likely to be taken into account in the latter's favour. This factor is obviously perceptible in [ case ]and, as noted above, in Birch v Paramount (1956). Perhaps the best indication of the effect of the concept of skill and knowledge can be seen in the contrasting cases of Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 and Dick Bentley v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623.
Answer
Couchman v Hill [1947] KB 554
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Where the party who made the statement had exclusive access to information or special knowledge as compared with the other party, this is likely to be taken into account in the latter's favour. This factor is obviously perceptible in [ case ]and, as noted above, in Birch v Paramount (1956). Perhaps the best indication of the effect of the concept of skill and knowledge can be seen in the contrasting cases of Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 and Dick Bentley v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Where the party who made the statement had exclusive access to information or special knowledge as compared with the other party, this is likely to be taken into account in the latter's favour. This factor is obviously perceptible in [ case ]and, as noted above, in Birch v Paramount (1956). Perhaps the best indication of the effect of the concept of skill and knowledge can be seen in the contrasting cases of Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 and Dick Bentley v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623.
Answer
Couchman v Hill [1947] KB 554
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it >Where the party who made the statement had exclusive access to information or special knowledge as compared with the other party, this is likely to be taken into account in the latter's favour. This factor is obviously perceptible in Couchman v Hill [1947] KB 554 and, as noted above, in Birch v Paramount (1956). Perhaps the best indication of the effect of the concept of skill and knowledge can be seen in the contrasting cases of Oscar Chess Lt
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.