Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623
FACTS: The plaintiff, Mr Bentley, told Mr Smith, of the defendant company, that he was on the look-out for a well-vetted Bentley car. Mr Smith subsequently obtained a Bentley car and Mr Bentley went to see it. Mr Smith told Mr Bentley that the car had done 20,000 miles only since the fitting of a new engine and gearbox. The mileometer also showed 20,000 miles. Later that day, Mr Bentley took his wife to see the car and Mr Smith repeated his statement. Mr Bentley took the car out for a run and then bought it for £1,850. The car was a disappointment to Mr Bentley and it soon became clear that the car had done more than 20,000 miles since the change of engine and gearbox. HELD by the Court of Appeal: distinguishing Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, that the statement as to the mileage was a term of the contract. [ reasoning ].
Answer
The defendant was a car dealer who should be taken to have better knowledge of such matters than the plaintiff, who was not involved in the motor trade
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623
FACTS: The plaintiff, Mr Bentley, told Mr Smith, of the defendant company, that he was on the look-out for a well-vetted Bentley car. Mr Smith subsequently obtained a Bentley car and Mr Bentley went to see it. Mr Smith told Mr Bentley that the car had done 20,000 miles only since the fitting of a new engine and gearbox. The mileometer also showed 20,000 miles. Later that day, Mr Bentley took his wife to see the car and Mr Smith repeated his statement. Mr Bentley took the car out for a run and then bought it for £1,850. The car was a disappointment to Mr Bentley and it soon became clear that the car had done more than 20,000 miles since the change of engine and gearbox. HELD by the Court of Appeal: distinguishing Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, that the statement as to the mileage was a term of the contract. [ reasoning ].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith [1965] 1 WLR 623
FACTS: The plaintiff, Mr Bentley, told Mr Smith, of the defendant company, that he was on the look-out for a well-vetted Bentley car. Mr Smith subsequently obtained a Bentley car and Mr Bentley went to see it. Mr Smith told Mr Bentley that the car had done 20,000 miles only since the fitting of a new engine and gearbox. The mileometer also showed 20,000 miles. Later that day, Mr Bentley took his wife to see the car and Mr Smith repeated his statement. Mr Bentley took the car out for a run and then bought it for £1,850. The car was a disappointment to Mr Bentley and it soon became clear that the car had done more than 20,000 miles since the change of engine and gearbox. HELD by the Court of Appeal: distinguishing Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, that the statement as to the mileage was a term of the contract. [ reasoning ].
Answer
The defendant was a car dealer who should be taken to have better knowledge of such matters than the plaintiff, who was not involved in the motor trade
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it it soon became clear that the car had done more than 20,000 miles since the change of engine and gearbox. HELD by the Court of Appeal: distinguishing Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, that the statement as to the mileage was a term of the contract. <span>The defendant was a car dealer who should be taken to have better knowledge of such matters than the plaintiff, who was not involved in the motor trade.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.