Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81 (HL). Here, the plaintiff required a horse for stud purposes. The plaintiff attempted to examine the defendant's horse but was told that he need not look for anything and that the horse was sound in every way. The price was agreed and delivery of the horse took place three weeks later. The horse was not in fact fit for stud purposes and the judge directed the jury to consider two points: first, did the defendant, at the time of the sale, represent that the horse was fit for stud purposes? Second, did the purchaser act on that in purchasing the horse? Both questions were answered in the affirmative and consequently, the statement was deemed [...]
Answer
to be a term of the contract.
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81 (HL). Here, the plaintiff required a horse for stud purposes. The plaintiff attempted to examine the defendant's horse but was told that he need not look for anything and that the horse was sound in every way. The price was agreed and delivery of the horse took place three weeks later. The horse was not in fact fit for stud purposes and the judge directed the jury to consider two points: first, did the defendant, at the time of the sale, represent that the horse was fit for stud purposes? Second, did the purchaser act on that in purchasing the horse? Both questions were answered in the affirmative and consequently, the statement was deemed [...]
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81 (HL). Here, the plaintiff required a horse for stud purposes. The plaintiff attempted to examine the defendant's horse but was told that he need not look for anything and that the horse was sound in every way. The price was agreed and delivery of the horse took place three weeks later. The horse was not in fact fit for stud purposes and the judge directed the jury to consider two points: first, did the defendant, at the time of the sale, represent that the horse was fit for stud purposes? Second, did the purchaser act on that in purchasing the horse? Both questions were answered in the affirmative and consequently, the statement was deemed [...]
Answer
to be a term of the contract.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it fendant, at the time of the sale, represent that the horse was fit for stud purposes? Second, did the purchaser act on that in purchasing the horse? Both questions were answered in the affirmative and consequently, the statement was deemed <span>to be a term of the contract.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.