Another factor which may have been at work in Schawel v Reade was that the defendant, by the strength of his statement, actually dissuaded the plaintiff from making further checks himself with regard to the fitness of the horse for stud purposes. This can be contrasted with [ case ]where the seller of a boat stated that it was sound but advised the buyer to have it surveyed. This advice showed that the seller did not intend that his statement should be taken as a term of the contract and that the onus of verification of the soundness of the boat lay with the purchaser.
Answer
Ecay v Godfrey (1947) 80 Lloyd's Rep 286
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Another factor which may have been at work in Schawel v Reade was that the defendant, by the strength of his statement, actually dissuaded the plaintiff from making further checks himself with regard to the fitness of the horse for stud purposes. This can be contrasted with [ case ]where the seller of a boat stated that it was sound but advised the buyer to have it surveyed. This advice showed that the seller did not intend that his statement should be taken as a term of the contract and that the onus of verification of the soundness of the boat lay with the purchaser.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Another factor which may have been at work in Schawel v Reade was that the defendant, by the strength of his statement, actually dissuaded the plaintiff from making further checks himself with regard to the fitness of the horse for stud purposes. This can be contrasted with [ case ]where the seller of a boat stated that it was sound but advised the buyer to have it surveyed. This advice showed that the seller did not intend that his statement should be taken as a term of the contract and that the onus of verification of the soundness of the boat lay with the purchaser.
Answer
Ecay v Godfrey (1947) 80 Lloyd's Rep 286
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it at work in Schawel v Reade was that the defendant, by the strength of his statement, actually dissuaded the plaintiff from making further checks himself with regard to the fitness of the horse for stud purposes. This can be contrasted with <span>Ecay v Godfrey (1947) 80 Lloyd's Rep 286 where the seller of a boat stated that it was sound but advised the buyer to have it surveyed. This advice showed that the seller did not intend that his statement should be taken as a
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.