The traditional distinction between conditions and warranties is no longer regarded as exhaustive. In [ case ]the Court of Appeal held that there are many terms which, at the outset, are neither conditions nor warranties but are of an innominate or intermediate nature. A breach of such a term, if it has a minor effect, will allow the innocent party to claim damages only. A breach with more serious consequences will allow the innocent party to treat the contract as repudiated and claim damages. This represents a more flexible approach and allows the court a good deal of leeway when dealing with cases where the purported innocent party is attempting to use a trivial breach in order to extract themselves from a contractual agreement which is no longer commercially advantageous.
Answer
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
The traditional distinction between conditions and warranties is no longer regarded as exhaustive. In [ case ]the Court of Appeal held that there are many terms which, at the outset, are neither conditions nor warranties but are of an innominate or intermediate nature. A breach of such a term, if it has a minor effect, will allow the innocent party to claim damages only. A breach with more serious consequences will allow the innocent party to treat the contract as repudiated and claim damages. This represents a more flexible approach and allows the court a good deal of leeway when dealing with cases where the purported innocent party is attempting to use a trivial breach in order to extract themselves from a contractual agreement which is no longer commercially advantageous.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
The traditional distinction between conditions and warranties is no longer regarded as exhaustive. In [ case ]the Court of Appeal held that there are many terms which, at the outset, are neither conditions nor warranties but are of an innominate or intermediate nature. A breach of such a term, if it has a minor effect, will allow the innocent party to claim damages only. A breach with more serious consequences will allow the innocent party to treat the contract as repudiated and claim damages. This represents a more flexible approach and allows the court a good deal of leeway when dealing with cases where the purported innocent party is attempting to use a trivial breach in order to extract themselves from a contractual agreement which is no longer commercially advantageous.
Answer
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The traditional distinction between conditions and warranties is no longer regarded as exhaustive. In Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26 the Court of Appeal held that there are many terms which, at the outset, are neither conditions nor warranties but are of an innominate or intermediate nature. A breach of such a term, i
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.