Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615

FACTS: The private seller of a motorcycle told the buyer, in good faith, that it was a 1941 or 1942 model. One week later, the buyer and seller entered into a contract of sale. The written memorandum of the sale did not mention the year of the model. The motor cycle was a 1930 model and the buyer sued for breach of contract. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the [...].
Answer
lapse of time between the making of the statement and entering into the contract meant the statement as to the year of the model was a representation and not a term of the contract

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615

FACTS: The private seller of a motorcycle told the buyer, in good faith, that it was a 1941 or 1942 model. One week later, the buyer and seller entered into a contract of sale. The written memorandum of the sale did not mention the year of the model. The motor cycle was a 1930 model and the buyer sued for breach of contract. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615

FACTS: The private seller of a motorcycle told the buyer, in good faith, that it was a 1941 or 1942 model. One week later, the buyer and seller entered into a contract of sale. The written memorandum of the sale did not mention the year of the model. The motor cycle was a 1930 model and the buyer sued for breach of contract. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the [...].
Answer
lapse of time between the making of the statement and entering into the contract meant the statement as to the year of the model was a representation and not a term of the contract
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
he buyer and seller entered into a contract of sale. The written memorandum of the sale did not mention the year of the model. The motor cycle was a 1930 model and the buyer sued for breach of contract. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the <span>lapse of time between the making of the statement and entering into the contract meant the statement as to the year of the model was a representation and not a term of the contract.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.