Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 FACTS: The plaintiffs, the owners of a pier, entered into a contract with a contractor to have the pier repaired and repainted. Under the terms of this contract, the plaintiffs had the right to specify the paint to be used by the contractor. On the faith of statements made by the defendants to the plaintiffs with regard to the defendants' paint and its fitness for painting the pier, the plaintiffs specified the paint to the contractor who bought the necessary quantity from the defendants. The paint proved to be quite unsuitable for painting the pier. The plaintiffs contended that the statements made to them by the defendants with regard to the suitability of the paint were enforceable warranties given in consideration of their specifying the paint to their contractor. HELD: [...].
Answer
The defendants' statements constituted a binding warranty, the breach of which entitled the plaintiffs to damages
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 FACTS: The plaintiffs, the owners of a pier, entered into a contract with a contractor to have the pier repaired and repainted. Under the terms of this contract, the plaintiffs had the right to specify the paint to be used by the contractor. On the faith of statements made by the defendants to the plaintiffs with regard to the defendants' paint and its fitness for painting the pier, the plaintiffs specified the paint to the contractor who bought the necessary quantity from the defendants. The paint proved to be quite unsuitable for painting the pier. The plaintiffs contended that the statements made to them by the defendants with regard to the suitability of the paint were enforceable warranties given in consideration of their specifying the paint to their contractor. HELD: [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 FACTS: The plaintiffs, the owners of a pier, entered into a contract with a contractor to have the pier repaired and repainted. Under the terms of this contract, the plaintiffs had the right to specify the paint to be used by the contractor. On the faith of statements made by the defendants to the plaintiffs with regard to the defendants' paint and its fitness for painting the pier, the plaintiffs specified the paint to the contractor who bought the necessary quantity from the defendants. The paint proved to be quite unsuitable for painting the pier. The plaintiffs contended that the statements made to them by the defendants with regard to the suitability of the paint were enforceable warranties given in consideration of their specifying the paint to their contractor. HELD: [...].
Answer
The defendants' statements constituted a binding warranty, the breach of which entitled the plaintiffs to damages
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it g the pier. The plaintiffs contended that the statements made to them by the defendants with regard to the suitability of the paint were enforceable warranties given in consideration of their specifying the paint to their contractor. HELD: <span>The defendants' statements constituted a binding warranty, the breach of which entitled the plaintiffs to damages.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.