Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
According to the so-called 'parol evidence rule', extrinsic evidence, oral or otherwise, may not be adduced which seeks to add, vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. Thus, in [case] it was stated that: 'parol evidence will not be admitted to prove that some particular term, which had been verbally agreed upon, had been omitted (by design or otherwise) from a written instrument constituting a valid and operative contract between the parties'.
Answer
Jacobs v Batavia & General Plantations Trust [1924] 1 Ch 287

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
According to the so-called 'parol evidence rule', extrinsic evidence, oral or otherwise, may not be adduced which seeks to add, vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. Thus, in [case] it was stated that: 'parol evidence will not be admitted to prove that some particular term, which had been verbally agreed upon, had been omitted (by design or otherwise) from a written instrument constituting a valid and operative contract between the parties'.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #terms
Question
According to the so-called 'parol evidence rule', extrinsic evidence, oral or otherwise, may not be adduced which seeks to add, vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. Thus, in [case] it was stated that: 'parol evidence will not be admitted to prove that some particular term, which had been verbally agreed upon, had been omitted (by design or otherwise) from a written instrument constituting a valid and operative contract between the parties'.
Answer
Jacobs v Batavia & General Plantations Trust [1924] 1 Ch 287
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
According to the so-called 'parol evidence rule', extrinsic evidence, oral or otherwise, may not be adduced which seeks to add, vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. Thus, in Jacobs v Batavia & General Plantations Trust [1924] 1 Ch 287 it was stated that: 'parol evidence will not be admitted to prove that some particular term, which had been verbally agreed upon, had been omitted (by design or otherwise) from a writt

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.