the rule that a party who signs a contract will be bound by their signature is subject to the proviso that there has been no fraud or misrepresentation.
Answer
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
the rule that a party who signs a contract will be bound by their signature is subject to the proviso that there has been no fraud or misrepresentation.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
the rule that a party who signs a contract will be bound by their signature is subject to the proviso that there has been no fraud or misrepresentation.
Answer
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the rule that a party who signs a contract will be bound by their signature is subject to the proviso that there has been no fraud or misrepresentation. In Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805, it was held that a party may be prevented from relying on incorporation of an exemption clause through signature of a docum
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.