UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to [ statute ]for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600.
Answer
Sch 2 UCTA
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to [ statute ]for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to [ statute ]for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600.
Answer
Sch 2 UCTA
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to Sch 2 UCTA for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as co
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.