UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to Sch 2 UCTA for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in [ case ].
Answer
Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to Sch 2 UCTA for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in [ case ].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to Sch 2 UCTA for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in [ case ].
Answer
Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it UCTA s 11(2) directs us to look to Sch 2 UCTA for 'Guidelines' for the application of the reasonableness test which are said to be relevant to ss 6 and 7. Due to their factual relevancy, however, they may be used more widely as confirmed in <span>Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] 1 QB 600.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.