A discretionary trust or power for ‘friends’ is void for uncertainty as indicated by Lord Upjohn in Re Gulbenkian’s ST because one cannot lay down precise requirements for a ‘friend’, yet Browne-Wilkinson J did so in [case].
Answer
Re Barlow’s WT
Tags
#certainties #equity #law
Question
A discretionary trust or power for ‘friends’ is void for uncertainty as indicated by Lord Upjohn in Re Gulbenkian’s ST because one cannot lay down precise requirements for a ‘friend’, yet Browne-Wilkinson J did so in [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#certainties #equity #law
Question
A discretionary trust or power for ‘friends’ is void for uncertainty as indicated by Lord Upjohn in Re Gulbenkian’s ST because one cannot lay down precise requirements for a ‘friend’, yet Browne-Wilkinson J did so in [case].
Answer
Re Barlow’s WT
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it /head>A discretionary trust or power for ‘friends’ is void for uncertainty as indicated by Lord Upjohn in Re Gulbenkian’s ST because one cannot lay down precise requirements for a ‘friend’, yet Browne-Wilkinson J did so in Re Barlow’s WT.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.