The case of [ case ]confirmed the view that Cunningham recklessness (as now set out in R v G) must be established for any assault charge based upon recklessness.
Answer
R v Savage; Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 714 (HL)
Tags
#crime #law #oapa
Question
The case of [ case ]confirmed the view that Cunningham recklessness (as now set out in R v G) must be established for any assault charge based upon recklessness.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #law #oapa
Question
The case of [ case ]confirmed the view that Cunningham recklessness (as now set out in R v G) must be established for any assault charge based upon recklessness.
Answer
R v Savage; Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 714 (HL)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The case of R v Savage; Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 714 (HL) confirmed the view that Cunningham recklessness (as now set out in R v G) must be established for any assault charge based upon recklessness.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.