Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #law #oapa
Question
MR for OAPA 1961, s 18
Answer
The defendant must actually intend to cause harm which amounts in law to grievous bodily harm. Recklessness is not enough.

Tags
#crime #law #oapa
Question
MR for OAPA 1961, s 18
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #law #oapa
Question
MR for OAPA 1961, s 18
Answer
The defendant must actually intend to cause harm which amounts in law to grievous bodily harm. Recklessness is not enough.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
><head>The mens rea element is the key distinguishing feature between the OAPA 1861, ss 18 and 20. Under the OAPA 1861, s 20 it is enough to intend or foresee (i.e. be reckless) some harm, however slight. Whereas, for the OAPA 1961, s 18 the defendant must actually intend to cause harm which amounts in law to grievous bodily harm (serious harm). Recklessness is not enough. Note, where the actus reus is a wound, the men

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.