In [ case ], the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and
in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
Answer
R v G [2003] UKHL 50
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In [ case ], the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and
in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
Answer
?
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In [ case ], the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and
in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
Answer
R v G [2003] UKHL 50
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In R v G [2003] UKHL 50, the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.