In R v G [2003] UKHL 50, the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
Answer
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and
in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In R v G [2003] UKHL 50, the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
Answer
?
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In R v G [2003] UKHL 50, the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
Answer
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and
in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In R v G [2003] UKHL 50, the House of Lords, having overruled R v Caldwell and declared it to be wrongly decided, stated that to convict a person of reckless criminal damage the prosecution must prove that:
at the time of committing the actus reus, the accused was subjectively aware of a risk; and in the circumstances known to him, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take tha
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.