If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it been restricted in all directions and that they are being confined or constrained within limits imposed by another. It is not sufficient for the claimant to show that they have been inconvenienced or restricted in one direction only. In <span>Bird v Jones [1845] 7 QB 742 the claimant was prevented from walking on part of a bridge. He was not falsely imprisoned as he was free to take an alternative route. If the claimant is being confined then they will
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs