Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#equity #formalities #law
Question
If the sub-trust is a ‘bare’ trust, where B has no active duties, B would effectively ‘drop out’ of the picture and the original trustee would hold on trust directly for X
Answer
Grainge v Wilberforce (1889) 5 TLR 436 and Re Lashmar [1891] 1 Ch 258

Tags
#equity #formalities #law
Question
If the sub-trust is a ‘bare’ trust, where B has no active duties, B would effectively ‘drop out’ of the picture and the original trustee would hold on trust directly for X
Answer
?

Tags
#equity #formalities #law
Question
If the sub-trust is a ‘bare’ trust, where B has no active duties, B would effectively ‘drop out’ of the picture and the original trustee would hold on trust directly for X
Answer
Grainge v Wilberforce (1889) 5 TLR 436 and Re Lashmar [1891] 1 Ch 258
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
reating a sub-trust but the position on the application of s 53(1)(c) is uncertain. Section 53(1)(c) does not apply to the creation of new trusts (the relevant provision is s53(1)(b), which applies only if the trust relates to land); BUT, <span>if the sub-trust is a ‘bare’ trust, where B has no active duties, B would effectively ‘drop out’ of the picture and the original trustee would hold on trust directly for X – Grainge v Wilberforce (1889) 5 TLR 436 and Re Lashmar [1891] 1 Ch 258.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.