The promise must be intended to affect legal relations and not simply amount to a gratuitous privilege given to the promisee. It is apparent from [ case ]that the promise need not be express but can be implied, as it was in that case, through conduct.
Answer
Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877) 2 App Cas 439
Tags
#consideration #contract
Question
The promise must be intended to affect legal relations and not simply amount to a gratuitous privilege given to the promisee. It is apparent from [ case ]that the promise need not be express but can be implied, as it was in that case, through conduct.
Answer
?
Tags
#consideration #contract
Question
The promise must be intended to affect legal relations and not simply amount to a gratuitous privilege given to the promisee. It is apparent from [ case ]that the promise need not be express but can be implied, as it was in that case, through conduct.
Answer
Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877) 2 App Cas 439
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The promise must be intended to affect legal relations and not simply amount to a gratuitous privilege given to the promisee. It is apparent from Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877) 2 App Cas 439 that the promise need not be express but can be implied, as it was in that case, through conduct.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.