Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#consideration #contract
Question
Facts: Petroleum Geo Services ('PGS') engaged DSND Subsea Limited ('DSND'), a professional diving operation, to carry out works in the North Sea constructing subsea structures. The contract was based on an assumption that the risers (pipes used to transfer produced fluids from the seabed to the surface facilities or lift gas), would have already been installed by PGS. DSND was to have full responsibility for the rest of the subsea system. Later, it transpired that the risers would have to be installed after the subsea system was in place. DSND was concerned about several issues and in particular, about the insurance that was in place. They thought that they would not be covered if they proceeded with the installation without further changes to the insurance and refused to continue with the work. Eventually, a memorandum of understanding ('MOU') and a memorandum of agreement ('MOA') were entered into which set out various changes to DSND’s payment and acknowledged that the risers were to be installed after the subsea system which brought DSND within insurance cover. After the risers were installed, PGS then informed DSND the contract was terminated on the basis of DSND's 'serious breach of contract'. PGS argued that both the MOU and MOA should be set aside for economic duress. The economic duress point was considered as a preliminary issue by the court.
Answer
DSND Subsea Limited (Formerly known as DSND Oceantech Limited) v Petroleum Geo Services ASA, PGS Offshore Technology AS [2000] BLR 530

Tags
#consideration #contract
Question
Facts: Petroleum Geo Services ('PGS') engaged DSND Subsea Limited ('DSND'), a professional diving operation, to carry out works in the North Sea constructing subsea structures. The contract was based on an assumption that the risers (pipes used to transfer produced fluids from the seabed to the surface facilities or lift gas), would have already been installed by PGS. DSND was to have full responsibility for the rest of the subsea system. Later, it transpired that the risers would have to be installed after the subsea system was in place. DSND was concerned about several issues and in particular, about the insurance that was in place. They thought that they would not be covered if they proceeded with the installation without further changes to the insurance and refused to continue with the work. Eventually, a memorandum of understanding ('MOU') and a memorandum of agreement ('MOA') were entered into which set out various changes to DSND’s payment and acknowledged that the risers were to be installed after the subsea system which brought DSND within insurance cover. After the risers were installed, PGS then informed DSND the contract was terminated on the basis of DSND's 'serious breach of contract'. PGS argued that both the MOU and MOA should be set aside for economic duress. The economic duress point was considered as a preliminary issue by the court.
Answer
?

Tags
#consideration #contract
Question
Facts: Petroleum Geo Services ('PGS') engaged DSND Subsea Limited ('DSND'), a professional diving operation, to carry out works in the North Sea constructing subsea structures. The contract was based on an assumption that the risers (pipes used to transfer produced fluids from the seabed to the surface facilities or lift gas), would have already been installed by PGS. DSND was to have full responsibility for the rest of the subsea system. Later, it transpired that the risers would have to be installed after the subsea system was in place. DSND was concerned about several issues and in particular, about the insurance that was in place. They thought that they would not be covered if they proceeded with the installation without further changes to the insurance and refused to continue with the work. Eventually, a memorandum of understanding ('MOU') and a memorandum of agreement ('MOA') were entered into which set out various changes to DSND’s payment and acknowledged that the risers were to be installed after the subsea system which brought DSND within insurance cover. After the risers were installed, PGS then informed DSND the contract was terminated on the basis of DSND's 'serious breach of contract'. PGS argued that both the MOU and MOA should be set aside for economic duress. The economic duress point was considered as a preliminary issue by the court.
Answer
DSND Subsea Limited (Formerly known as DSND Oceantech Limited) v Petroleum Geo Services ASA, PGS Offshore Technology AS [2000] BLR 530
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
DSND Subsea Limited (Formerly known as DSND Oceantech Limited) v Petroleum Geo Services ASA, PGS Offshore Technology AS [2000] BLR 530 Facts: Petroleum Geo Services ('PGS') engaged DSND Subsea Limited ('DSND'), a professional diving operation, to carry out works in the North Sea constructing subsea structures. The contr

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.