Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#constitution #equity #law
Question
In Re Stewart [1908] 2 Ch 251, the rule was extended to perfect an imperfect gift of bonds to the donor’s wife, equity positively intervening to oust the common law position, the donor being responsible for her acquiring title to the bonds as one of his appointed executors. Note, however, that the rule in Strong v Bird does not apply to [...], which is in effect merely a promise (not enforceable in the eyes of the law) to make a gift at some later date.
Answer
an intention to make a gift in the future

Tags
#constitution #equity #law
Question
In Re Stewart [1908] 2 Ch 251, the rule was extended to perfect an imperfect gift of bonds to the donor’s wife, equity positively intervening to oust the common law position, the donor being responsible for her acquiring title to the bonds as one of his appointed executors. Note, however, that the rule in Strong v Bird does not apply to [...], which is in effect merely a promise (not enforceable in the eyes of the law) to make a gift at some later date.
Answer
?

Tags
#constitution #equity #law
Question
In Re Stewart [1908] 2 Ch 251, the rule was extended to perfect an imperfect gift of bonds to the donor’s wife, equity positively intervening to oust the common law position, the donor being responsible for her acquiring title to the bonds as one of his appointed executors. Note, however, that the rule in Strong v Bird does not apply to [...], which is in effect merely a promise (not enforceable in the eyes of the law) to make a gift at some later date.
Answer
an intention to make a gift in the future
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
donor’s wife, equity positively intervening to oust the common law position, the donor being responsible for her acquiring title to the bonds as one of his appointed executors. Note, however, that the rule in Strong v Bird does not apply to <span>an intention to make a gift in the future, which is in effect merely a promise (not enforceable in the eyes of the law) to make a gift at some later date.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.