Section 53(1)(b) applies to express trusts; LPA 1925, s 53(2) provides that the requirements of s 53(1) do not affect [...]. Section 53(2) exempts these trusts from the need for writing. A good example of the operation of s 53(2) is the case of Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892.
Answer
the creation or operation of implied, resulting and constructive trusts
Tags
#equity #formalities #law
Question
Section 53(1)(b) applies to express trusts; LPA 1925, s 53(2) provides that the requirements of s 53(1) do not affect [...]. Section 53(2) exempts these trusts from the need for writing. A good example of the operation of s 53(2) is the case of Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892.
Answer
?
Tags
#equity #formalities #law
Question
Section 53(1)(b) applies to express trusts; LPA 1925, s 53(2) provides that the requirements of s 53(1) do not affect [...]. Section 53(2) exempts these trusts from the need for writing. A good example of the operation of s 53(2) is the case of Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892.
Answer
the creation or operation of implied, resulting and constructive trusts
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Section 53(1)(b) applies to express trusts; LPA 1925, s 53(2) provides that the requirements of s 53(1) do not affect the creation or operation of implied, resulting and constructive trusts. Section 53(2) exempts these trusts from the need for writing. A good example of the operation of s 53(2) is the case of Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.