[ case ]FACTS: The defendant inserted his fist into the victim's vagina during heterosexual lovemaking. The defendant claimed that he did not intend to cause the level of harm sustained and that it was done for the purpose of sexual gratification. HELD: Consent was not allowed as a defence..
Answer
R v Boyea [1992]Crim LR 574 (CA)
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ]FACTS: The defendant inserted his fist into the victim's vagina during heterosexual lovemaking. The defendant claimed that he did not intend to cause the level of harm sustained and that it was done for the purpose of sexual gratification. HELD: Consent was not allowed as a defence..
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ]FACTS: The defendant inserted his fist into the victim's vagina during heterosexual lovemaking. The defendant claimed that he did not intend to cause the level of harm sustained and that it was done for the purpose of sexual gratification. HELD: Consent was not allowed as a defence..
Answer
R v Boyea [1992]Crim LR 574 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it R v Boyea [1992]Crim LR 574 (CA) FACTS: The defendant inserted his fist into the victim's vagina during heterosexual lovemaking. The defendant claimed that he did not intend to cause the level of harm sustained and tha
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.