Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant had inserted his fist into the victim during heterosexual lovemaking. The victim's injury was caused by a ring on the finger of the defendant, which he had forgotten about. There was no intention to cause harm and the defendant did not see the risk of causing harm. The victim died of septicaemia resulting from cuts caused by the ring. HELD The defendant was acquitted of unlawful act manslaughter on the grounds that he lacked the mens rea for assault or battery, i.e. the injury was caused accidentally during the course of consensual sexual activity.
Answer
R v Slingsby [1995] Crim LR 570

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant had inserted his fist into the victim during heterosexual lovemaking. The victim's injury was caused by a ring on the finger of the defendant, which he had forgotten about. There was no intention to cause harm and the defendant did not see the risk of causing harm. The victim died of septicaemia resulting from cuts caused by the ring. HELD The defendant was acquitted of unlawful act manslaughter on the grounds that he lacked the mens rea for assault or battery, i.e. the injury was caused accidentally during the course of consensual sexual activity.
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant had inserted his fist into the victim during heterosexual lovemaking. The victim's injury was caused by a ring on the finger of the defendant, which he had forgotten about. There was no intention to cause harm and the defendant did not see the risk of causing harm. The victim died of septicaemia resulting from cuts caused by the ring. HELD The defendant was acquitted of unlawful act manslaughter on the grounds that he lacked the mens rea for assault or battery, i.e. the injury was caused accidentally during the course of consensual sexual activity.
Answer
R v Slingsby [1995] Crim LR 570
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Slingsby [1995] Crim LR 570 FACTS: The defendant had inserted his fist into the victim during heterosexual lovemaking. The victim's injury was caused by a ring on the finger of the defendant, which he had forgotte

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.