R v Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328 FACTS: T falsely claimed to be collecting data for a breast cancer survey. T had no clinical qualifications. Several women consented to a breast examination. HELD: T was convicted, and his conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal. The women's consent was vitiated as they had been deceived as to the purpose of the examination, and by the fact that T had no qualifications. This appears to have been [...], although the reasoning is not entirely clear.
Answer
deception as to the quality of the act
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328 FACTS: T falsely claimed to be collecting data for a breast cancer survey. T had no clinical qualifications. Several women consented to a breast examination. HELD: T was convicted, and his conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal. The women's consent was vitiated as they had been deceived as to the purpose of the examination, and by the fact that T had no qualifications. This appears to have been [...], although the reasoning is not entirely clear.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328 FACTS: T falsely claimed to be collecting data for a breast cancer survey. T had no clinical qualifications. Several women consented to a breast examination. HELD: T was convicted, and his conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal. The women's consent was vitiated as they had been deceived as to the purpose of the examination, and by the fact that T had no qualifications. This appears to have been [...], although the reasoning is not entirely clear.
Answer
deception as to the quality of the act
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it T was convicted, and his conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal. The women's consent was vitiated as they had been deceived as to the purpose of the examination, and by the fact that T had no qualifications. This appears to have been <span>deception as to the quality of the act, although the reasoning is not entirely clear. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.