Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA)

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ] FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA) FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent th

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.